What timing technology is right for your race?

Accurate race timing is fundamental to the success of any event, ranging from small community fun runs to large-scale marathons and ultra-endurance challenges. With technological advancements, race directors and timers now have access to a diverse array of tools designed to capture each participant's performance with reliability and efficiency. However, the multitude of available options can make it difficult to identify the most appropriate for your event's specific requirements.

SUBSCRIBE TO BEHIND THE FINISH LINE

In this post, we provide a comprehensive comparison of both new and emerging race timing solutions, detailing their operational mechanisms, advantages and disadvantages, and the types of events for which they are most suitable. We will examine the capabilities of each system or results-gathering process, emphasizing their applications in particular scenarios.

Quick Links

This post is quite detailed, so you might want to jump to specific sections. Here are some handy quick links to help you navigate through the article. At the end of each section, there's a 'back to the top' link to easily return here.

Popular Race Timing Technologies You Need to Know

The technologies we're about to dive into are tried-and-true favorites, appreciated by timers all across the US. They've been around for decades, making them reliable staples for events of every kind and size.

Manual Timing

Manual Timing represents the most fundamental and traditional approach to race timing. This method involves the use of human-operated stopwatches, timing applications, or spreadsheet-based tools to accurately record the times of participants as they pass key checkpoints or the finish line. Race officials or volunteers are responsible for manually pressing a stopwatch or entering times, often simultaneously noting participant bib numbers. Although manual timing lacks the scalability and precision of contemporary systems, it remains a viable and economical choice for events with limited budgets and smaller participant numbers. It serves effectively as a primary system for very small events and as a backup for other timing solutions.

Common Uses - Small-scale events, short distance races, backup timing, informal events.

Chips/Tags - While manual timing does not require tags, they are frequently used alongside other chip-based solutions to enhance accuracy and data collection.

Technology Details

• Athlete Density - Manual timing is most effective in low-density events, generally accommodating fewer than 30 athletes per minute. Exceeding this number can increase the risk of missed or inaccurate timing due to the limitations inherent in human recording.

• Signal Range - This aspect is not applicable, as the timing process relies on the direct visual observation of participants as they cross designated timing points.

• Accuracy - The accuracy of manual timing is significantly influenced by the operator's reaction time and the density of athletes. With an experienced time recorder, the typical margin of error ranges from approximately 0.5 to 2 seconds.
• Costs - Numerous mobile applications are available, allowing manual timing to be implemented at virtually no cost.

• Cost-effective solution: Manual timing requires minimal financial investment, making it an affordable option for event organizers with limited budgets.
• Straightforward and portable: The method is easy to implement and can be used anywhere, thanks to mobile timing applications that are readily accessible.
• Adaptability: Manual timing can be quickly deployed, making it suitable for a wide variety of small-scale events.
• Dependability: Despite its simplicity, manual timing is a reliable method for accurately recording race times when managed by experienced operators.
• Versatility: This approach can accommodate diverse event types, from informal gatherings to more structured races, providing flexibility in timing solutions.

Challenges of Manual Timing

• Susceptible to inaccuracies due to human error: Manual timing relies on human operators to record times, which can lead to mistakes such as pressing the stopwatch too early or too late, especially under pressure or fatigue.
• Limited capacity for handling high participant density: This method struggles with events where many participants cross the finish line simultaneously, as it depends on the operator's ability to accurately record each time without missing any.
• Reliance on operator's experience: The accuracy and efficiency of manual timing are heavily dependent on the skill and experience of the person operating the stopwatch or timing application, which can vary significantly.
• Increased workload for post-event data Entry and Verification: After the event, times must be manually entered into a system for results processing, which can be time-consuming and prone to further errors, requiring additional verification steps.

back to top >

High Speed Camera-based Timing

High-Speed Camera-Based Systems employ advanced cameras to capture images or videos of athletes as they cross designated timing points. These systems utilize visual indicators, such as bib numbers or finish-line positions, to accurately identify participants and record their times. Often used as a secondary verification method in conjunction with other timing technologies like RFID, these camera systems can also operate independently for events that demand precise photo-finish accuracy.

Common Uses - Track and field events, events requiring the ability to provide photo-finish results, backup and verification.

Chips/Tags - High-speed camera-based timing systems do not require tags; however, they are frequently utilized alongside Passive RFID or DF timing systems to enhance accuracy and data collection.

Technology Details

• Athlete Density - These systems are equipped with cameras capable of capturing over 2000 or more frames per second, making them suitable for recording smaller groups of athletes, such as those in heats or waves.
• Signal Range - The effectiveness of high-speed camera-based timing systems is contingent upon maintaining a clear line-of-sight. Therefore, cameras must be strategically positioned to capture precise visual data of bib numbers or participants within designated areas.

• Accuracy - High-speed camera systems represent one of the most precise timing options available, offering an accuracy of approximately 0.01 seconds.

• Costs - The cost of this type of timing service can vary significantly, ranging from several hundred to several thousand dollars, depending on the geographical location and the specific requirements of the event.
   

Advantages of Camera-Based Timing Systems

• Precision: High-speed camera-based timing systems provide the highest level of precision among timing technologies.
• Visual verification: They allow for visual confirmation of finish positions, ensuring accurate recorded times and tracking of participant progress.
• Supplement to other timing systems: They can be used as a supplementary method to enhance the accuracy of other chip-based timing systems.

Challenges of Camera-Based Timing Systems

• Line-of sight dependency: High-speed camera-based timing systems require an unobstructed view to accurately capture images or videos of participants as they cross timing points. Proper camera placement is crucial to ensure that all athletes are visible and identifiable, especially in crowded or complex race environments.
• Post-race analysis: Recorded footage often needs to be reviewed to verify the accuracy of the captured times and participant identification.
• Cost considerations: Professional-grade high-speed camera systems can be expensive, with costs ranging from several hundred to several thousand dollars.

back to top >

Passive Radio Frequency Identification (Passive RFID)

Passive RFID is a prevalent technology in race timing, widely adopted for its efficiency and effectiveness. This system functions by utilizing RFID tags, which are affixed to participants' bibs, shoes, or other wearable items. These tags are powered by the energy emitted from an RFID reader's signal, enabling them to transmit information back to the reader. This method is energy-efficient and facilitates cost-effective timing for events with a high density of participants.

Common Usages -  Marathons and road races, triathlons, fun runs and charity events, and trail runs. 

Chips/Tags - Passive RFID technology offers both disposable and reusable options, typically categorized into three primary types utilized in race timing:

• Bib tags are thin RFID tags that are either embedded in or attached to participants' bib numbers. These tags are typically designed to be disposable, making them a cost-effective option. Additionally, their lightweight and compact nature facilitates easy distribution among participants.

• Shoe tags are compact RFID tags affixed to participants' footwear, providing precise readings at ground level.

• Ankle tags are RFID tags encased in protective material, primarily utilized in aquatic or multi-sport events. These tags are typically reusable, although some systems offer disposable ankle tag options based on the specific requirements of the event.

Technology Details

• Athlete Density - Passive RFID systems are capable of managing the timing of 500 to 1,000 athletes per minute at a single timing point when equipped with a single antenna. By incorporating additional antennas and readers, these systems can accommodate over 1,000 athletes per minute. However, it is important to note that without proper configuration of antennas and readers, there is a risk of missing reads during events with very high participant density at the start.
• Signal Range - The typical read range varies between 3 to 10 feet (approximately 1 to 3 meters), influenced by factors such as the power of the antenna and the orientation of the tag.
• Accuracy - Passive RFID offers an accuracy range of 0.1 to 0.5 seconds, which is generally adequate for a majority of recreational and competitive events. However, it may not be suitable for events requiring photo-finish precision or elite-level competitions.
• Costs - 

  Race organizers engaging a timing service that utilizes a Passive RFID system should anticipate costs ranging from $1.50 to $5 per participant, contingent upon the size and timing configuration of the event.

Advantages of Passive RFID

• Cost-effectiveness: Passive RFID technology is an economical choice for event organizers due to the low cost of RFID tags, making it accessible for events with budget constraints.
• Scalability: This system can efficiently handle events with a large number of participants, accommodating tens of thousands without compromising performance.
• Versatility: Suitable for a wide range of events, from marathons to triathlons, Passive RFID can be adapted to various race formats and participant densities.
• Reliability:  When antennas and readers are properly configured, Passive RFID systems deliver consistent and dependable timing results, ensuring accurate data collection.
• Ease of use: The use of disposable tags eliminates the need for collecting tags after the event, streamlining the process for organizers and reducing logistical challenges.

Challenges of Passive RFID

• Limited range: Passive RFID systems have a restricted read range, typically requiring tags to be within 3 to 10 feet (approximately 1 to 3 meters) of the antennas for effective data capture.
• Tag orientation: The position and orientation of RFID tags are critical for achieving accurate reads. Misaligned tags can lead to missed or inaccurate data collection.
• Improper antenna configuration: Proper setup of antennas is essential, especially at starting lines with high participant density, to ensure all tags are read accurately. Inadequate configuration can result in missed reads.
• Environmental interference: Factors such as metal surfaces and water can interfere with the performance of passive RFID systems, potentially affecting the accuracy and reliability of data collection.

back to top >

Active Radio Frequency Identification (Active RFID)

Active RFID technology employs tags equipped with an internal power source, typically a small battery, which enables them to continuously transmit signals to readers. In contrast to Passive RFID, Active RFID does not depend on the reader's energy to transmit data. This characteristic facilitates extended read ranges and enhances readability, even in challenging environments. Active RFID is especially advantageous for events that necessitate participant tracking, albeit not in real-time, or in scenarios where participants are dispersed over a large area.

Common Usages - Motorsports, cycling events, obstacle/adventure races, large endurance events.

Chips/Tags -

Active RFID chips necessitate the use of a battery, typically a small coin cell battery, and are designed for reuse rather than disposal. Depending on the specific application, there are multiple options for mounting or wearing these chips.

 Technology Details

• Athlete Density - Active RFID systems are capable of managing the timing of over 1,000 athletes per minute at each timing point without missing any reads, provided that all chip internal batteries are operational.
• Signal Range - The read range can extend from 10 to over 350 feet (approximately 3 to over 100 meters), contingent upon the specific configuration of the antenna.
• Accuracy - Active RFID provides a high level of precision, with an accuracy range of +/- 0.05 to 0.1 seconds, making it ideal for events that demand exact timing. This accuracy is maintained even in environments with potential interference or when tags are not optimally oriented.
• Costs - Considering the expenses associated with the chips and tags, a race director should anticipate a cost ranging from $8 to $50 per participant when utilizing an Active RFID system, with the exact amount varying based on the size and configuration of the event.

Advantages of Active RFID

• Extended antenna lengths and increased read range: Active RFID systems can utilize longer antennas, which allow for greater coverage areas. The increased read range can extend from 10 to over 350 feet, depending on the antenna configuration.
• Enhanced precision: Active RFID offers high accuracy, typically within +/- 0.05 to 0.1 seconds.
• Capable of managing high athlete density: The system can handle over 1,000 athletes per minute at each timing point without missing reads. This capability ensures reliable data collection even in crowded race conditions.
• Enables near-real-time tracking: Proper placement of antennas and readers allows for continuous data transmission.

Challenges  of Active RFID

• Higher costs: Active RFID systems are generally more expensive than Passive RFID systems.
• Battery dependency: Active RFID tags require an internal power source, typically a battery, and regular maintenance is necessary. 
• Battery dependency, tags require periodic maintenance and battery/unit replacement
• Antenna durability: Antennas in Active RFID systems may need additional protection especially in harsh or challenging environments.

back to top >

Dual Frequency (DF)

Dual Frequency (DF) represents an advanced form of RFID technology that integrates two distinct frequency bands, High Frequency (HF) and Ultra-High Frequency (UHF), into a unified system. This integration enhances both the readability and reliability of the system, especially in challenging environments where signal interference or high athlete density may occur. DF technology provides an extended read range, increased read rates, and improved accuracy compared to traditional passive RFID systems. These features make it an excellent choice for events with high participant density or those with intricate timing needs.

Common Uses - Large road races, obstacle races, triathlons, cycling events.

Chips/Tags - Dual Frequency (DF) tags are available in both disposable and reusable forms, with several variations including:

• Bib tags, which are integrated into race bibs for easy use.
• Ankle or shoe tags, constructed from durable plastic to withstand wear.
• Bike tags, specifically engineered to maintain readability despite changes in motion or orientation.

Technology Details

• Athlete Density - Dual Frequency (DF) systems are capable of processing over 1,000 athletes per minute at each timing point. The integration of High Frequency (HF) and Ultra-High Frequency (UHF) technologies significantly reduces the likelihood of missed reads.

• Signal Range - High Frequency (HF) technology is capable of detecting signals within a range of up to 1.5 feet (0.5 meters), making it suitable for close proximity detection. In contrast, Ultra-High Frequency (UHF) technology can detect signals over a longer range, typically between 10 to 30 feet (3 to 10 meters). Dual Frequency (DF) systems offer the advantage of flexible antenna placement, allowing them to effectively manage both short and long-range detection scenarios.

• Accuracy - Dual Frequency (DF) systems offer an accuracy range of +/- 0.1 to 0.3 seconds, contingent upon the specific configuration. The DF technology significantly improves accuracy in conditions that pose challenges for Passive RFID systems, such as environments with metal interference or moisture.
• Costs - Race directors should anticipate costs ranging from $3 to $10 per participant, which vary based on the specific type of tag employed and the chosen timing configuration.

Advantages of DF

• Less prone to interference and tag orientation issues: DF systems effectively reduce interference and accurately read tags in any orientation, ensuring reliable data capture even in disruptive environments and reducing missed reads.
• Broader detection zones and near-field precision: Offers extensive monitoring over short and long distances, providing precise readings for nearby tags and enhancing accuracy at key points.
• Capable of handling high athlete density: Designed to handle large participant groups, DF systems maintain accuracy in crowded conditions and efficiently process large numbers of participants, ensuring smooth operations.
• Combined HF and UHF improve overall performance: Combines HF and UHF for improved adaptability and performance, suitable for various race scenarios including transitions, checkpoints, and finish lines.

Challenges of DF

• Higher cost per participant: Dual Frequency (DF) systems generally incur higher costs per participant compared to Passive RFID systems
• Complexity of readers: DF readers are more complex and require careful setup and configuration to function optimally.
• Environment factors : Environmental factors such as rain, wind, and temperature fluctuations can impact the performance and reliability of DF tags when compared to battery-powered options. 

back to top >

Niche Timing Solution for Specialized Events

The technologies mentioned below are well-established, though not widely used by timers across the US. They offer some unique perks that might be just right for certain types of events.

Global Positioning System (GPS)

Global Positioning System (GPS) technology employs a constellation of satellites to accurately determine the location of a participant's GPS-enabled device, which may include a smartphone, wearable tracker, or a dedicated timing unit. In the context of race timing, GPS is predominantly utilized for real-time tracking of participants' locations, verifying course adherence, and timing checkpoints in events that cover extensive distances or are widely dispersed. This technology is particularly effective in delivering live updates for events that span large geographical areas, where the deployment of fixed timing equipment, such as readers, may not be feasible.

Common Uses - Ultramarathons, trail races, adventure races, cycling events, virtual events and challenges.

Chips/Tags - There are two primary options for implementing GPS timing:

• Dedicated GPS devices: These are compact, durable units carried by participants, specifically engineered for endurance events, and equipped with built-in batteries.
• Smartphones and wearable devices: These include fitness trackers and other portable technology that can be used to monitor participants' progress.

Technology Details

• Athlete Density - GPS technology offers significant scalability, enabling the simultaneous tracking of thousands of participants without the need for additional infrastructure.
• Signal Range - GPS offers worldwide coverage by utilizing satellite signals. However, it is important to note that GPS requires a clear line of sight to these satellites, which can be obstructed in densely populated urban environments or beneath thick natural canopies.
• Accuracy - GPS technology offers a timing accuracy that ranges from approximately 2 to 10 seconds, which is influenced by the strength and quality of the signal. Additionally, it can determine positional accuracy within a range of 10 to 30 feet (3 to 10 meters) in open areas.
• Costs - A race director utilizing a dedicated GPS device should anticipate costs ranging from $15 to $100 per participant, contingent upon the size and scope of the event. Alternatively, employing participants' smartphones as GPS trackers can be cost-effective, with the only potential expenses arising from software fees.

Advantages of GPS

• Continuous Real-Time Tracking: GPS enables the continuous monitoring of participants' locations in real-time. This feature is invaluable for spectators, event directors, and staff, as it allows them to track the progress of each participant throughout the race. Real-time data can be accessed via various platforms, providing updates on participants' positions and estimated finish times.
• Scalability for traditional and virtual events: GPS technology is highly scalable, making it suitable for events with a large number of participants. The technology is versatile enough that is can be used for both traditional in-person events and virtual events.
• Course verification and monitoring: With GPS, race courses can be pre-loaded into the system, allowing for real-time monitoring to ensure participants stay on the correct path.
• No additional infrastructure or equipment needed: One of the major advantages of GPS is that it does not require additional infrastructure, such as timing mats or antennas, to function. This reduces logistical challenges and costs associated with setting up traditional timing systems.

Challenges of GPS

• Accuracy limitations: GPS technology is effective for tracking participants' locations but struggles with providing precise timing at race finishes. This is due to the inherent limitations in consumer-grade GPS devices, which often lack the necessary accuracy for exact finish line timing.
• Battery consumption on smartphones and wearables: The continuous use of GPS on smartphones or wearable devices can significantly drain battery life. This necessitates additional charging, especially for longer events, to ensure devices remain operational throughout the race.
• Cost of dedicated trackers: Dedicated GPS trackers, while offering more reliable tracking, can be expensive.
• Line of sight requirement and data gaps: GPS technology requires a clear line of sight to satellites to function effectively. Any obstructions, such as buildings or dense foliage, can cause data gaps, impacting the reliability and accuracy of the tracking information.

back to top >

Near Field Communication (NFC)

Near Field Communication (NFC) is a technology that facilitates wireless data exchange over short distances, typically a few inches. In the context of race timing, NFC is predominantly utilized for events that require participants to check in at specific points. This is achieved by having participants tap an NFC-enabled tag, which is often integrated into a wristband, bib, or card, against a reader or smartphone to accurately log their time and location.

Common Uses - Small-scale events, trail runs and ultra races, self-timed events, fitness challenges. 

Chips/Tags - There are several types of chips/tags available, including:

• Reusable, waterproof wristbands or those embedded in bibs.
• Handheld cards or keyfobs, which can be either reusable or disposable.
• NFC-enabled phones, which can function as both "chips" and readers.

Technology Details

• Athlete Density - NFC technology operates with a low density rate because the tag must be in close proximity, typically within a few inches, to the reading device. This allows for the processing of approximately 10-20 athletes per minute under standard conditions.
• Signal Range - NFC technology is employed for close proximity readings due to its typical range being less than 2 inches.
• Accuracy - When a chip is tapped, the time is recorded with an accuracy typically within +/- 0.1 second. However, this precision is largely contingent upon the participant's adherence to the procedure.
• Costs - A race director implementing this technology for their event should anticipate costs ranging from $2 to $20 per participant, contingent upon whether the tags are disposable or reusable and configuration of the event.

Advantages of NFC

• Highly accurate and dependable: NFC technology ensures precise timing as the tag must be very close to the reader, reducing the chance of interference.
• Cost effective for small events: This technology is especially cost-efficient, making it an ideal choice for events with a smaller scale.
• Smartphone compatible: Smartphones can function as both NFC readers and tags, adding convenience and flexibility. Easy for both participants and organizers; participants simply tap their device to log their time.
• User-friendly: Easy for both participants and organizers; participants simply tap their device to log their time.

Challenges of NFC

• Participant interaction: Participants must physically interact with the timing equipment, which can lead to compliance issues.
• Inconsistent data collection: NFC's reliance on participant engagement can result in inconsistent data collection and may require additional staff to ensure compliance.
• Low capacity and scalability: The system has a low capacity, making it unsuitable for crowded start lines, finishes, or high-speed events.

back to top >

Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)

Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) is a wireless communication technology specifically engineered for low-power, short-range data transmission. In the context of race timing, BLE employs small, battery-operated beacons or tags that emit signals at regular intervals. These signals are detected by BLE-enabled devices, such as smartphones, tablets, or dedicated readers, facilitating the identification of participants and the tracking of checkpoints. The seamless integration of BLE with mobile devices makes it a versatile option for timing and tracking across various types of events.

Common Uses - Small to mid-sized endurance events, multi-sport events, virtual/hybrid event, ultramarathons, trail events.

Chips/Tags - BLE chips or beacons necessitate the use of a battery, typically a small coin cell battery, and are designed for reuse rather than disposal. Depending on the specific application, there are multiple options for mounting or wearing these devices.

Technology Details 

• Athlete Density - BLE systems are capable of managing the timing of around 100 to 250 participants per minute at a single checkpoint. This capacity is influenced by the capabilities of the device used to collect the data.
• Signal Range - The read range can vary from less than 1 foot up to approximately 40 feet depending on the equipment and its configuration.
• Accuracy - BLE systems offer a timing precision ranging from approximately 0.5 to 3 seconds. Certain reader software can be configured to adjust the read range, thereby enhancing accuracy.
• Costs - Race organizers engaging a timing service that utilizes a BLE system should anticipate costs ranging from $2.50 to $10 per participant, contingent upon the size and scope of the event.

Advantages of BLE

• Smartphone compatible: Seamless integration with smartphones and other mobile devices minimizes the need for costly reader equipment.
• Cost-effective for small to mid-sized events: Reduced costs for events that don't need high density start or finish times. 
• Portable and flexible: Mobile phones can act as readers, making the system highly portable facilitating deployment in challenging terrains or remote locations. 
• User-friendly: Both participants and organizers will find the process straightforward; participants need only to wear their chip, while organizers can easily set up a phone or dedicated reader.

Challenges of BLE

• Capacity and scalability: Athlete density can become a factor in BLE’s success in race timing and can vary significantly depending on the device(s) used. 
• Battery dependency: BLE tags and beacons rely on batteries, necessitating regular maintenance and replacement, and they are not designed for single-use.
• Precision limits: The precision offered by BLE may not meet the requirements for highly competitive events or those needing exact timing.

back to top >

Emerging Timing Technology

The technologies described below signify emerging advancements in race timing. Although currently employed by a limited number of timers in the United States, these innovations demonstrate potential. However, they are not yet suitable for use as primary timing systems.

Camera-Vision Systems

Camera-Vision Systems employ cameras equipped with optical character recognition (OCR) or computer vision software to capture images or videos of athletes as they pass designated timing points. These systems utilize sophisticated algorithms to identify bib numbers and correlate them with participant records in real time.

Common Uses - Very small events as a standalone, supplementary system for chip-based timing systems. 

Chips/Tags - Camera-Vision Systems do not require tags; however, they are frequently utilized alongside Passive RFID or Dual Frequency (DF) timing systems to enhance accuracy and data collection.

Technology Details

• Athlete Density - Standalone systems depend on the visibility of race numbers, meaning that the density of athletes at the finish line significantly influences the system's effectiveness.
• Signal Range - The effectiveness of camera-vision systems is contingent upon maintaining a direct line-of-sight. It is essential to strategically position cameras to ensure they capture clear visual data of bib numbers or participants within designated areas.
• Accuracy - When employing high-speed cameras, the accuracy can reach up to 0.01 seconds. However, when utilizing Optical Character Recognition (OCR), an accuracy range of approximately +/- 1 to 3 seconds is typically anticipated.
• Costs - Certain systems utilize high-quality phone cameras for this purpose; however, the costs can rise considerably with the addition of specialized software. When used independently, a race director should anticipate expenses ranging from approximately $3 to $20 per participant.

 Advantages of Camera-Vision Systems

• Rapid processing: OCR technology allows for the quick identification and processing of bib numbers, significantly reducing the time required to log participant data.
• Automated timing recording: By automating the time recording process, these systems minimize human error and ensure more accurate results when comparing the traditional standalone high-speed camera systems.
• Adaptability and scalability: Camera-vision systems offer rapid and straightforward deployment in challenging environments. Optical Character Recognition (OCR) systems are scalable, making them suitable for events of varying sizes, from small local races to large international marathons, where they can serve as a supplementary system. 

Challenges of Camera-Vision Systems

• Requires consistent bib placement and limited density: When used as a standalone system,  Bib numbers must be consistently placed and visible on participants' clothing to ensure they are easily visible to the camera systems.
• Clear line-of-sight: The system relies on maintaining an unobstructed view of each participant as they pass the designated timing points. Proper camera positioning is essential to capture clear images of bib numbers, which is critical for accurate data collection.
• Potential post event reviews: When used as a standalone system, a thorough review of the recorded footage may be necessary to validate the times and ensure that all participants' data has been accurately captured.

back to top >

Long Range/Long Range Wireless Access Network (LoRa/LoRaWAN)

LoRa/LoRaWAN is a low-power, wide-area wireless communication technology engineered to transmit small data packets over extensive distances. Similar to other timing technologies in their early stages, LoRa is beginning to be integrated into smaller timing systems. It functions on the LoRaWAN protocol, enabling battery-powered tags or devices carried by participants to communicate with gateways, which then relay the information to a central server. The approximate location of participants can be determined through triangulation using the tags and multiple gateways.

Common Uses - While not in common use, the theoretical use cases for LoRa would include ultramarathon and trail events, adventure races, cycling events, and multi-day endurance events.

Chips/Tags - LoRa chips necessitate the use of a battery, typically a small coin cell battery, and are designed for reuse rather than disposal. These chips can be affixed in various configurations depending on the specific application requirements.

Technology Details

• Athlete Density - LoRa technology is capable of connecting thousands of devices within a single network simultaneously.
• Signal Range - LoRaWAN's documented range in open areas extends from 10 to 15 kilometers. However, in urban settings or regions with obstructions, the signal range typically decreases to between 1 and 5 kilometers.
• Accuracy - LoRa systems employ triangulation, utilizing multiple gateways in conjunction with the tag to determine an approximate location. The timing accuracy of these systems is estimated to range from +/- 5 to 20 seconds, primarily due to the nature of periodic data transmissions.
• Costs - In the context of race timing, this technology has not yet reached a level of commercial maturity, meaning its availability is limited and pricing can vary considerably. The estimated cost for purchasing reusable trackers is between $20 and $50 per device.

Advantages of using LoRa Technology

• Long-range coverage with minimal infrastructure requirements: LoRa/LoRaWAN technology can cover large geographical areas and requires less equipment compared to traditional timing technologies, reducing cost and complexity. 
• Scalability: LoRaWAN can support a large numbers of devices within a single network and transmits periodic, small data packets efficiently over long distances.
• Predictive participant tracking: With proper configuration, LoRaWAN can enable predictive tracking of participants, providing insights into their progress and estimated times.

Challenges of LoRa Technology

• Accuracy limitations: LoRa technology's accuracy is limited by its inherent capabilities and the nature of periodic data transmission, making it unsuitable for real-time tracking or use at starting or finishing lines. 
• Environmental interference:  Environmental factors, such as terrain and weather conditions, can significantly affect the range and reliability of a LoRa system.
• Battery dependency: LoRa tags rely on batteries, necessitating regular maintenance and replacement, and they are not designed for single-use.

back to top >

Summary

To make it easier to compare the technologies we've talked about, we've put together a handy summary table. This table helps you see how each system stacks up in terms of performance and practical use.

• Primary System: This shows if the technology is a good fit as the main timing system for events today. You'll see a 👍 if it's a great choice or a 👎 if it's better as a backup or for special situations.
• Density: This tells you how well the technology can handle the number of athletes crossing a timing point. 
  • 🏃‍♂️ = less than 100 participants per minute
  • 🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️ = 100 to 1,000 participants per minute
  • 🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️ = 1000+ participants per minute
• Accuracy: This reflects how precise the results are with the technology.
  • ⏱️⏱️⏱️ = less than 0.1 seconds
  • ⏱️⏱️ = 0.2 to 1.9 seconds
  • ⏱️ = 2 seconds or more
• Chip/Tag: This describes whether the chips or tags are disposable or reusable.
  • 🗑️ = disposable
  • ♻️ = reusable
  • 🚯 = reusable and not disposable (chips/tags are not disposable if they contain a battery)
• Cost: This gives you a general idea of the expected cost for using the technology in an event.

*NFC's accuracy is dependent on participant compliance. 

back to top >

Conclusion & How We Can Help

Race timing technology has really evolved from the old days of stopwatches and notepads, giving event organizers and race directors many great options to ensure participants get accurate and reliable results. From the popular and trusted passive RFID to cool new solutions like Bluetooth and GPS, each system has its own special strengths to fit different event needs. Even specialized tools like camera-vision systems are there as essential backups to provide precision for elite-level competitions. Getting to know these technologies can help race directors make smart choices that match their event size, budget, and goals.

At Negative Split Productions, we're all about providing smooth race timing solutions using passive RFID, Bluetooth, and GPS technologies. Our setup ensures accuracy and scalability for events of any size. Whether you’re planning a local 5k or a multi-day event, we’ve got the expertise and tools to meet your timing needs.

If you’re interested in learning more or want to chat about the best options for your race, feel free to reach out to us today or talk to your local timing professionals. Happy running and keep hosting  amazing races!

back to top >